Sample repair report
Midnight Doves website audit
www.midnightdoves.com
Midnight Doves is clear as an unofficial Prince guide, but repeated page shells and broad utility labels make the site feel more templated than editorial.
A real scan of a fan/reference site covering homepage, About, Contact, Ads Disclosure, and album pages.
Start here
Make the hero and first navigation row do more editorial work: name the audience, the promise, and one concrete route through the guide.
This sample keeps the main diagnosis, score pattern, evidence notes, and first fixes from a real saved scan.
See fix orderReviewed site
www.midnightdoves.com
- 6 pages reviewed
- Screenshot evidence included
- Editorial site
Score breakdown
Why the score landed here.
The full report has more evidence, but this sample preserves the same scoring style and judgment.
AI-Slop Risk
26/100The topic is real, but repeated page shells weaken the authored feeling.
Specificity
75/100Album pages are concrete; top-level pages stay broader.
Trust
71/100Contact and policy pages help, but process proof is too light.
Originality
45/100The content subject is distinctive, while the layout language is familiar.
Pages reviewed
The scan checked these pages.
Homepage
Primary pageAbout
Supporting pageContact
Supporting pageAds Disclosure
Supporting pageAlbums / 1999
Supporting pageAlbums / Batman
Supporting page
Screenshot evidence
The advice stays tied to what the scan could see.
- 1Hero language
The entry labels are clear, but too broad for a site whose value is editorial judgment.
- 2Shared card system
The scan flags repeated shells that make different pages feel less authored.
- 3Credibility details
About and Contact need more visible proof of process, sourcing, and correction handling.
Top issues
What the short report flags first.
Homepage
HighThe homepage leans on broad entry labels.
Make the hero and first navigation row name the audience, promise, and one concrete route.
About
HighAbout page claims careful method without visible proof.
Add one process example showing what counts as a source or how a page is checked.
Homepage
MediumThe utility pages reuse the same card pattern too often.
Vary page shells by intent so editorial, contact, and policy pages feel distinct.
Fix order
What the report would tell you to do first.
Make the opening copy more editorial and specific.
Add one sourcing-process example on the About page.
Vary page shells by intent instead of reusing the same card rhythm everywhere.